Find a Lawyer

FARRUKH JAVED GHUMMAN versus THE STATE

Section 9 (a) (v) and 14 (c) Convention of Martyrdom (10 of 1984) Article 2 (4) alleges of corruption and corruption, being a public servant, charged with a landlord and In this case, the accused who accepts the illegal satisfactorily assumes, in the present case, the meaning of Section 9 (a) (v) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, to his \ known sources of information on the sole charge of acquiring assets and property. Was disputed by Sources of Income / Explanation and Explicit Requirements Investigation Officer's Duty Ordinance Form Under Section 14, Determination of crime against the accused and the burden of proof of the evidence of the accused under Section 342, CR PC Identification Officer's valuable statement statement Acceptance and inconsistency The prosecution, in the present case, failed to exclude the initial burden of proof, but the trial court did not yet convict the accused on the basis of this y piece of evidence that indicates That the accused had assets which were not in accordance with his income leading source of income which was recorded But the conversion of property to a litigation granted by a trial court when litigation litigation may increase. He had succeeded in relieving the burden of his initial evidence and the accused had failed to uphold it: unless the contrary was proved - the accused was guilty of the offense with which the accused under s. A statement was denied. Under the meaning of Section 14 (c) of the National Accountability, Ordinance, 1999, 342 would not be sufficient to prove CCPC or worse, to the contrary, which was charged. top advocate from Domeli lawyer