Find a Lawyer

AMER KHAN versus THE STATE

Section ((b) (c) West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XNX of 65656565), Section A Criminal Criminal Procedure Code (VV 1898), Sections 1190, 5435 and 943) To be prosecuted under Section 11 (b) (c) of the Delivery of Illegal Arms Act, 1991, after the surrender of the Additional Sessions Judge, To appeal the case, the magistrate moved the case, saying that the application was dismissed, a review was filed against the High Court's first information report which showed that M The alleged recovery of illegal weapons from the occupation of Zaman took place on 11, 2002 and there was no material to make serious allegations, according to which the weapon was also in the possession of the accused. The target was set under the Arms Act 1991 extradition provisions, in which case the accused could not prosecute under the surrender. On 7/11 2002 of the Illegal Arms Act, 1991 on charges of possessing illegal weapons. They were allegedly recovered, but could only be prosecuted under the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, and said Or that the ordinance was worth hearing by a magistrate under section 14 of that. The High Court of West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, directed the Additional Sessions Judge to transfer the magistrate authorized to record the case against the accused. advocate for immigration from Kot Mithan lawyer