Find a Lawyer

GHULAM HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

Section 1 561A and 505050 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), the petition for termination of Article 24 Order was detained by the applicant under Section 555, proof of ownership of the two CCP and the applicant mentioned above. Time to submit. The custody of the two accused said that in the meantime, on the request of another person, the magistrate petitioner had presented him the receipt in which he had shown the purchase of two beads in his favor, the police received the request received by the applicant. However, the magistrate ordered his first order under which the two patients were handed over to another person and directed the applicant to provide possession of the said patients, but said the magistrate rejected the application and thereafter Verification by the Additional Sessions Judge Mars did not comply. Has been shown or stolen or involved in any theft case or has been confirmed to be involved in a commission. The custody of the said person was stated by the magistrate or by someone else in the appropriate course, in the circumstances, on horses. Was to be handed over to the applicant, which was seized by the police from the custody of both the magistrate and the Additional Sessions Judge, having passed uncontested orders, exceeded their limits, and passed on to the applicant a citizen of the property. The decision was taken to decide the dispute, saying that the other person, in reference to the controversial horse owner, The one who presented the correct receipt was deprived of his horses without error, while a stranger was added and with the help of it was stated in Article 24 of the Constitution. To the applicants under pakistani advocates Taxila lawyer