Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN LAWYERS FORUM versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Article 3 (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 41 (6) and 199 Constitutional Referendum Wine of Referendum Order, 2002 Question was prepared and a poll was held for public opinion on the question formulated and as such. That has been informed by the election. The majority of the commission, which votes, was positive, and General Pervez Musharraf was announced to receive a democratic mandate from the public to serve the nation as President of Pakistan for a period of five years. Largely rigged and tarnished the sanctity of the belt box and therefore had no legal effect. A number of newspaper reports and articles along with the constitutional petition have guaranteed the High Court's judicial notice, stating that the reports can only be considered as evidence and no further recording of evidence has been sought to support the allegations in the petition. That no such restriction was necessary in this case because the overall effect of newspaper reports and articles published by different opinion leaders proved that the sanctity of the whole process was gone and Whatever was evident, there was no need for conviction. That newspaper reports, press clippings and various articles were published in various newspapers after the referendum; they were never specifically contradicted by the Election Commission of Pakistan, indicating that the allegations were accepted. Is. That the High Court may examine the government's actions, including the Election Commission of Pakistan, in its constitutional jurisdiction, and a member of the Election Commission of Pakistan had separately declared that the referendum was unconstitutional and resigned. property advocates from Nilore lawyer