Find a Lawyer

RANA MUHAMMAD ANWAR versus D.I.-G.

Section 6, 9 (c) and 21 Prohibition (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3/4/28 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), trial of a police officer during trial against section 87 Repeat action. The suspect's father filed a request to the Deputy Inspector General of Police in which he stated that the case against his son was a liar and he re-investigated his son's case through independent, impartial and directly direct government officials. The request was made and the request was re-examined. The case was ordered and the police officer who, after thorough investigation of the facts and circumstances of the case, investigated the case, concluded that the accused was innocent and the accused in the sub-challan was deputy inspector general in column 2. He again agreed to the investigation, ordered action against him. Assistant Sub Inspector Police, who had earlier investigated the case and ordered to furnish challan against it and also to keep it in C. Sub-challan Trial Court proceeded against the said police officer, Section 737373. There is no legal restriction on the re-investigation of the case even after submitting a final report under the CRPC and the police law, it is capable of investigating and submitting it. The court order report submitted by the deputy inspector general for the re-investigation of the case was perfectly legal and did not demand interference, filing false documents against baseless persons and fines spread alarmingly across the country. ? The courts and most of the senior officials took notice criminal advocate from Ukba lawyer