PUNJAB AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPLIES CORPORATION (DEFUNCT) versus QAZI MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE
Sections 2 (1) and (6) Constitution of Pakistan (1973); Article 199 Constitutional Complaint for Complaint for Pension / Gratuity Right to Enumeration of Pensions / Gratuity from the Ombudsman's Jurisdiction for Voting Defendant's request for a count of his previous services was rejected and it was stated that the corporation's order had been finalized because the defendant was not challenged. After filing a complaint of almost 23 years against the corporation, ignoring all the legal objections raised by the corporation, the respondents of the Appeal Department passed the order against the corporation and against the order of the provincial Ombudsman. Its representation was also deleted. The Governor's endorsement employees of the corporation were public servants as defined under section 2 (6) of the Punjab Office of Ombuds Act 1997 and the corporation agency as stated in section 2 (1) of the said Act, in the circumstances, Had no jurisdiction , Enjoy the defendant's complaint / petition, pass the orders of the order of the aforementioned, in view of which, without jurisdiction and without any legal authority and law provisions of the corporation were defamatory under which the corporation The petition was filed by the High Court keeping aside the unclean orders of the Ombudsman.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
