Find a Lawyer

PATTOKI SUGAR MILLS versus LABOUR COURT

Section 25A, 38 (3) and 51 of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Section O 15 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution dismiss the application, re-enactment Discard full back benefits The person who committed fraud, breach of trust, misconduct, misconduct and dishonesty in performing the duties was prosecuted and dismissed and a criminal case against him. Also, the employee was merely suspected that he did not inform the administration. After giving notice of what had happened and due to this, after giving them a charge sheet and inquiry against them, the employer employed him on the complaint request made by the employees under section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. Dismissed from labor court, and he dismisses the dismissal order against the employee. The Labor Appellate Tribunal was ordered to reinstate the job with full payback benefits, though Labor maintained that the court reinstated the employee, but reduced the employee's half in honor of the back benefit. It was observed that the employee did not provide practical service to the employer establishment, he was not entitled to reimbursement benefits, then the employee was not blamed for any misconduct. Found by the Labor Appellate Tribunal and that he was dismissed from his job due to a mistake and the employee was entitled to reinstatement after dismissal, at least. Declare the reduction in benefits female advocates from Mehar lawyer