Find a Lawyer

ABDUL KHANAN versus THE STATE

The prosecution's case of defining Section 13 evidence was that the accused was arrested as a result of a raid on Hajra and a 30 bore pistol was recovered from his possession with 39 bore rounds, and further investigation resulted in three Kalashnikovs were recovered, it was said that 12 bore shotguns with 18 cartridges and 12 bore repeaters with four cartridges were said to have hidden copies of pistol-related battery licenses, 12 bore shotguns and 12 bore repeaters. The accused presented to the Investigation Officer, which was taken properly. Minor witnesses were captured through a restitution memorandum, but Kalashnikov's unlicensed prosecution did not offer anything to indicate that Kalashnikov belonged to the suspect and that he had taken a wallet. Under cover, the night of the wedding of the accused and the son of Hawaii. The wedding was shot down to celebrate the wedding, and a large number of guests who came out of the premises were invited to retrieve the weapon, in connection with a suspected suspect and an unlicensed Kalashnikov, The matter was clearly missing, in which case the property was not presented to the court to confirm whether any defamatory material was presented to the court by the prosecution. The evidence presented by the prosecution on the production of the substance of the accused without the accusations of the witnesses' statements is overwhelming, with the trial court failing to rely solely on it and the prosecution's failure to link the accused to the commission. No scope for building a foundation immigration advocates contact from FR Bannu lawyer