ZUBAIR versus THE STATE
The accused accused of defining Section 302 (b) evidence had submitted his report before the police. The accused further confessed that he and the deceased were only present in the house when the crime took place, when the accused was present on the occasion at the relevant time. Thus, the case of the accused was kept pending that his deceased wife was beaten. A co-accused was shot and killed by a pistol in his presence, was forged, and was completely evicted from medical evidence. It was not challenged before the incident that she was threatening her life at the hands of the accused and her brothers and they would be prosecuted under Section 107/151, which was not challenged. Was a legal piece of strong conditions. After his confession with the crime, he was charged that he was alone in the house with the victim at the time of the incident, needing to explain that it was not him, but someone else. Committed the murder, but when he was questioned under Section 2 asked Cr, he refused to exclude the burden and was moved to it, the motive being exclusively with the accused who committed the crime. There was a calf, the suspect tried to kill two birds with one stone. Kill the victim and send the escaped accused to execution. The victim spent 2 to 4 hours on the victim, then not moving the injured to the hospital, and not reporting the matter to the police immediately; this was another strong situation that reflected his behavior. ? The accused had punished a poor and defenseless woman, and in these circumstances, the accused should be retained
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Pasni lawyer