Find a Lawyer

MEHTAR YOUSAF---PETITIONER versus THE STATE

Sections 6 516A, 7 517 and 1 561 The applicant was the only person to abolish the order of the request for a supermarket vehicle, who claimed to have had a supercar in the Seahid vehicle, confessed to it. Went and was in control of the applicant, in which case it would be only legal to accept the petition filed by the applicant in respect of the Superdry and legally, if any competing claimant was not for the delivery of a car, then, on Superddy, the general As such, the person to whom the vehicle was seized was not eligible for investigation. In the question of title as to why their jurisdiction was limited under section 1616 AA, CRPC or for that matter, until the determination of the rights of possession under section 171717, CRPC and no title to property was owned. The question was to be decided by a competent civil court. law websites from Gari Mori lawyer