Section 498 Prohibited (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 5, 3 and 4 Pre-arrest interim guarantee of intoxication, based on a prior notice confirming legal possession of alcohol, laid a check point for arrest of the accused Gone, but the police managed to escape by leaving the suspect behind his motorcycle, in which 80 bottles of alcoholic beverages, which were non-Muslim, had valid permits and permits. Articles 3 and 4 of the Prohibition of Enforcement to Keep Units of Alcohol Unit, 1979, were not attracted to the present case in such circumstances, it was not mentioned in the FIR that Given the fact that the police party had advance information and was setting up a check point for the arrest of the accused, the question was how much alcohol was contained in the 80 bottles, which was allegedly left behind by the accused. How did you succeed in escaping the presence? Police officers, who were armed with a record of the weapon, did not indicate that the motorcycle was allegedly behind, it meant that the suspect did not know the police, so, the question is It was how the police found out that the person who administered the police was a police officer but nevertheless an FIR was lodged after an extraordinary delay of about 24 hours, which itself raised suspicion that the accused was involved in the case. It was suspicious to be involved. And the facts available on the record spoke of instability by the police, the suspect was confirmed in a pre-granted bail bail status.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
