Find a Lawyer

RIZWAN WAHID versus PRESIDING OFFICER, SPECIAL COURT (OFFENCES IN BANK)

The declaration of the Declaration relating to section 42 and title 54 was related to the possession of the plaintiff's property at the hearing of the judgment passed by the criminal court dispute and it was claimed that the suit was sold to the property and the possession was to the buyer. Was delivered because the bulk of the consideration amount was received by predecessor. The plaintiff's buyer disappeared and the balance consideration amount was unpaid, therefore, the plaintiffs recovered possession and the plaintiff's bank initiated a criminal proceeding against the buyer for the commission of fraud, during the criminal proceedings, the bank had to issue Was entitled to take possession of the land. The plaintiffs' bankruptcy court property was purchased in such a way as to give the plaintiffs ample opportunity to present their case, but they failed to convince the plaintiffs that the trial court had raised. The deciding M was not necessarily the URT with the smugness and Katie's face, initially benefited unfairly and manipulated the situation in favor of the plaintiffs' foreword allocating a large portion of the consideration to the sale. So he could not be the owner of the suit property judgment passed by the offenders. The court was finalized, so it cannot be questioned in the civil suit. The relief is a discretionary relief; the defendants who reached the court with illicit hands could not be allowed or they could have taken the case. Or with no illicit benefit or harm to the plaintiff's bank plaintiff and had no legal role to maintain this case and should have advocates from Mandi Faizabad lawyer