Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MESSRS INTERGLOBE COMMERCE PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN


Section 21 Section RO 400 (1) / 97 dated 31 5 1997 Section RO 435 (I) / 2001, Customs General Order No. 7 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), dated 18 6 2001, Article 199 exempted from the constitutional application duties locally. The list of goods manufactured on the goods is not included in the imports of goods, the granting of certificates of immunity from the approval of such equipment on bank guarantee furnishings under section RO 400 (I) / 97 and section RO 435 (I) / 2001 and The request for the release of the Bank Guarantee case has been granted after providing the applicant with a hearing and obtaining information from local manufacturers, as to the local preparation status of such equipment board. It was sent to the Engineering Development Board for feedback that some imported equipments were manufactured locally. Applicants believed that locally manufactured equipments were the validity of imported equipments in the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction. Not compatible with the High Court, the dispute will not enter into the fact that the technical aspects of the import equipment such as the board's task was to determine only whether the imported materials were being manufactured locally by the applicant. Whether or not and the applicant's imported equipment Relevance or appropriateness could not be determined. Locally manufactured equipments law did not make any arrangements to determine the suitability or suitability The legal proceedings formulated under the law to determine the disputed question of the status of imported equipments were also decided by an invalid order. , Which did not face any illegal interference, the High Court dismissed the constitutional petition

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Padidan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.