Find a Lawyer

MIRA KHAN versus THE STATE

Sections 514 and 439A of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX 1965), Section 13 Prohibition (Enforcement Hadith) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3/4 Bail Bond, Seizure of Applicants stands on bail on charges of which , Was sentenced and sentenced. Not satisfied with the amount convicted by the trial court state, the accused filed a review against the trial court's order not to appear in the trial court on the charge of trial, Section 51414, to the applicants / guarantees, Notice was given under the CRPC and the bail bail presented by them was forfeited. With the directive to submit bail money to the state treasury, the applicants, according to the Bail Bond, set bail for the accused, the impression being that the accused was convicted and sentenced during trial proceedings in the trial court. After sentencing, the applicants / bailiffs were dismissed. His legal obligations in connection with the bail bonds were presented by the trial court in connection with the trial against the accused and they did not. The state filed bail against the accused in the review case and at no stage did he accept any responsibility that he would present the accused through a trial court order after his conviction and conviction. The court was completely ignored by the seizure. The obligation of guaranteed bonds to be guaranteed must be determined on the terms of the bond and the bond must be strictly exercised. solicitors from Jalozai lawyer