Find a Lawyer

THE STATE versus MUHAMMAD RAJA

Section 302/307/34 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), section 417 (1) appeals against the eviction, explaining the delay in making a report to the police, as well as the improvement and contradictions in the testimony of the eyewitnesses. Has been tortured. His testimony is doubtful and untrustworthy, which did not affect trust. Only the injuries suffered by the eyewitness during this incident will not make him a true witness. The incident was not disclosed as if the prosecution. Suggested that the prosecution had thrown a wide net. For this incident, not all male members of the accused's family were satisfactorily established, being themselves the accused's fugitive was not enough to prove his guilty mind and he was meaningless to be prosecuted in any way. As well as failing to link them to the commission of the crime. The evidence was very unpleasant and full of flaws. Only one doubt was sufficient for the fate of the accused. The amended verdict was based on valid and strong reasons and was not subject to any illegality according to which the appeal was dismissed. jobs for fresh advocates from Bajaur lawyer