Find a Lawyer

SHAIRAZ AHMAD NAZ versus DR. KAMAL KHAN

Sections 497 (5), 435 and 439 Panel Code XV of 1860), Section 302/324/337 A (i) 1337 F (i) / 109/147/148/149 Guarantee, charged with the cancellation of a direct role. The suspects were neither equipped with any weapons nor were they harmed in any way. The question is whether the suspects motivated the other accused to kill the deceased, further investigation is needed which may also be at the trial stage. The men were a woman who was entitled to be released on bail under the provisions of Section 1 (1) of section 497, among other reasons, in the CCP case of the other co-accused who was not yet known. Whether or not he was co-accused was not called a co-accused and the only charge against him was that he had picked up Lalcara. Whether there was evidence that it was said that the co-accused was involved in the crime to a degree, the other two suspects were also acquitted. Murdered with the murder act, but, in the first post-mortem report, it is not supported that the prosecutor's witness suffered simple injuries to an unimportant part of his body, the co-accused of the murderous attack on the deceased. The intention, he said, was that the co-accused, in the second case, was more related to the player's improper responsibility, the FIR would be pursued during the investigation of the co-accused, section 161, the prosecution under CRPC. The statements of the witnesses were recorded and the material is shown. Involvement of suspects in suspicion, suspicion of suspects and further inquiry was required best advocate from Doltala lawyer