Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus KHURSHEED

Section 2 evidence None of the witnesses appearing for the prosecution before the trial court hearing the value of the evidence was a witness to the incident in which the direct evidence of the eyewitness testimony of the alleged witnesses In the absence, the complainant and the two prosecution witnesses were called in the presence. The deceased's mother and the witness of the incident did not testify that witnesses who allegedly described the incident were not presented to the court and they were presented to the court and police in statements of admissible witnesses. Was that they saw the accused. The police diary was running from the shootings which revealed that the statements of the four witnesses were dropped in writing but neither the prosecutor nor the complainant had requested to call them through the court proceedings. Eyewitnesses filed an affidavit before the trial court stating that they had no knowledge of any of the incidents and were given false references as witnesses alleged that prosecution was due to non-witnesses' testimony. The accused is obliged to prove the facts of the charge because he claimed the prosecution, in the present case, failed to prove the facts, but it also failed in his duty. Prove the offense against the accused Two persons who were eyewitnesses and were relied on in the report under Section 737373, CR PC, were not presented and they were declared as subordinate, they were prosecuted. Without putting them in the witness box, their duties will never change. The court declared its sacred best advocate from Ghuzdar lawyer