Find a Lawyer

TAHIR ANSAR versus MST. MAKHMAL JAN

For the payment of Section 20 and Scheduled Criminal Procedure (V 1898), Section 488 Former Rehabilitation Allowance, the plaintiff (wife) claimed that she was forcibly expelled from the house of the plaintiff and her husband. Was not tried and the family court ordered the plaintiff to pay restitution allowance from the date of decision of the case till the date when the lawful decree for the last care under Azad Jammu and the Kashmir Family Courts Act 1993 The proceedings could not be allowed to enforce the right of rehabilitation under the Jammu and Kashmir Family Courts Act 1993 and section 488, CR PC, because That its nature was civil as before, while the latter were criminal or semi-criminal for both proceedings and different proceedings were granted, in the circumstances, the plaintiff was not authorized to issue, However, from the date of the filing of the petition to the restoration allowance until the date of the court order decision was erroneously granted, it was not illegal by the Family Court and was amended accordingly. Was gone Shariah Court divorce advocates from Dadakhel lawyer