Find a Lawyer

MST. AISHA BIBI versus MUHAMMAD MALIK

Failure to produce documentary evidence proving Ounce's belief in Islamic law at the time was related to the deceased owner's legacy of the victim's dispute, when the victim claimed he was heard while defendant claimed he was a Shiite. Is. The trial court dismissed the case, while the appellate court allowed the appeal and ruled in favor of the plaintiffs. A person's religion or profession is so natural that it cannot always be emphasized by documentary evidence. Change his community during his life and this fact can be supported by people who lived around him. The defendants presented one of the deceased's neighbors who claimed that the victim was his There was no such claim by the witness who organized the meeting organs in the house. In relation to the belief of a person contradicted by the plaintiff, the most important witness is his family member when the family member is a person who states that their relationship was with a particular community and then the person who denies it. It takes a lot of burden to establish the right to oppose, claiming that a particular sect, can have some financial benefit to the family of the victim, which has made people more generally available for their trust in society. Through sentiment, the defendants had sufficiently restricted themselves to prove that the deceased was a Shiite and until the death of the first issue on the issue of sect. Detection palette Court were separated, and the trial resulting in the decision has been restored to the order approved by the Court and the case was dropped by the claimants escape immigration advocates contact from Haveli Lakha lawyer