MUHAMMAD RIAZ versus THE STATE
The delay in filing the FIR was not explained in section 2 ???? b (b) / re 34 evidence, according to the complaint. And he suspected the prosecution version too. The complainant was adopted by the police for lack of police legs to stand and the accused was identified as the police did not parade the identity of one of the accused and did not name him in the FLR prosecution version. Was told that all four bullets were fired, but six crime-related advertising was recovered from the scene. Nothing was returned from the complainant's house and in this case the accused's version was considered more understandable and understandable than the prosecution's and in this case the accused's version was likely to be true or closer. The truth, could not be denied and the trial court dismissed the sentence and sentence against the accused, ordered the accused to be released under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Ubaro lawyer
