MUKHTAR AHMAD versus THE STATE
The accused, accused of defining Section 2 (b (b)) evidence, was immediately named in the FIR filed. The witnesses, deceased or interfaith, had no room to refute their testimony. The accused taken by them had no previous hostility to the false allegations of Pliya, by which he was not established by independent evidence or by the terms of the case. Could not prove that the incident occurred at the time it was minor and that the matter was settled under section 308 (b), the PPC trial court, in the circumstances. , The accused was properly convicted and sentenced.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Kandiaro lawyer
