Find a Lawyer

NAWAZ versus THE STATE

Section 2 302 (evidence) Evidence Cage sentence Extension of sentence The incident was reported to the police immediately Medical evidence was not in serious conflict with oral testimony and minor difference or difference in the ocular version and medical report of the case. There was no material importance to the virtues. The complainant, who reasonably accounted for his presence on the occasion, fully supported the prosecution's story in which it was alleged that the accused had fired his pistol at the victim, the complainant had investigated the incident. Gave a very accurate calculation and had no enmity against the accused. Firearms expert could not be excluded in this case because of his close connection to the crime scene, the firearms expert said, according to a report by the arms expert. According to the report, the pistol was recovered. On the accused's offer, the delay in sending the recovered articles to the specialist, in the absence of any defect in the PA, the case of the Investigation Officer was not a good ground for dismissing their value and effect in this case. Was proven through independent and untrue evidence that the motive for the incident was set on record and the conviction of the accused was maintained in the circumstances in which it was alleged that he acted brutally. While commuting to the cold-blooded murder of an 20/21-year-old armed boy when he was going to a village mosque with his grandfather that he was going to a village mosque to pray Friday, the death sentence was pronounced There was nothing to stop it. The trial court sentenced the accused to life imprisonment immigration advocates email from Gari Habibullah lawyer