Find a Lawyer

FAZALAY MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE

Section 302/109/188 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 Evidence Cage Gra grave and sudden outrage conviction, reduction, both eyewitness testimonials make a general statement of this incident. Provided constant evidence of Said witnesses cross-examined at considerable length, but their testimony went almost unexpectedly, except for a few contradictions and improvements, the defense leader called the eyewitnesses for any personal purpose, illicit desire, or a double. Had failed to advise Rangesh against his alleged involvement in the murder. Therefore, his testimony cannot be excluded altogether, both the victims were killed at the same time in the house of the accused, blood was recovered from both places near each other, the accused disappeared after the incident. And he was arrested a short time later. Knowing that her new bride was killed that day, the accused had also presented a crime pistol to the police in the presence of witnesses Tangi, who was the brother of the victim, had made an appearance and after committing the crime. The accused appeared to him the next night and revealed that he had killed the two accused in an illicit relationship and indulgence. There was no evidence that the cause of death was within the prohibited degree from the site of the deceased woman where the male victim was killed, not only inside the accused's home, but also near the place where the female victim was killed. The deceased also supported the fact that they could be lonely for abusive designs for illicit intercourse. The female victim's brother online advocate from Patoki lawyer