Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD FAISAL versus THE STATE

Definition of Section 12 Explanatory Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 377, 377/109 and 292 Proofs. The father of the victim, who accompanied him to the police station to file an FIR, was neither presented with prosecution testimony nor in support of the prosecution's case, which was allegedly corrupt. The bed sheet and the victim's clothes were not seized, police did not target the sodomy victim for medical examination, no sign of violence was confessed on the victim's body. Were available, nude photos of the victim did not support the prosecution's version, nor did the suspect link the crime commission, suspect T give a more immature young witnesses, including the patient's eyes are protected and can not believe their statements. And trusted the owner of the mansion that allegedly committed the crime was not included in the investigation by the police who allegedly tried to defend the defense in a prosecution case after the alleged mansion hit the wall. It was not submitted before the court that there was an attempt to be satisfied by the aforementioned youth in the village for political retaliation when it was alleged that the accused had been acquitted. property advocate from Jalal Pur Jatan lawyer