Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD BASHARAT versus THE STATE

The delay in filing the sections 302 (b) / 324 / 337f (i) / 148/149 cannot be viewed with suspicion because there was no indication that the case was registered by the police. Delayed so as to allow time or help to present the story to the complaining party, even though two witnesses were not presented by the prosecution, but their non-presentation was in any way a pretext for the trial. Can't affect. First of all, because the prosecution was neither obliged to examine every witness of the crime, nor could any prosecutor's testimony be unpredictable and in no way affect the credibility of those witnesses. That is, the only relevant question examined was whether the evidence presented in this case was sufficient to prove the allegation, but not the number of witnesses, but the credibility and credibility of the evidence to be considered dead. The eye was mostly related to eyewitnesses, but it was to itself. There is no standard or standard for excluding evidence that was otherwise reliable and came from what would normally be expected given the testimony of an interested witness, at this time Cannot be excluded until it is proved that the witness is involved. Occasionally relevant witnesses, sometimes especially in murder cases, may be found more reliable because they, because of their relationship with the victim, do not allow the real culprit to go away or an innocent person to be replaced. In the present case, without any doubt, the accused was able to prove the crime, the participation of all the accused in the crime. divorce advocates from Liaquat Pur lawyer