SHER DIL versus THE STATE
Section 396 Convention of Martyrs (10 of 1984), Section 40 of the Criminal Procedure Code (V 1898), section 417 The bad appeal against the accused was not successful on the same evidence on which the original accused was found guilty, allegedly by the accused. The statements were unacceptable. The disclosure by the original accused of involvement in legal charges in the evidence and involvement in the crime was not admissible in view of Article 40 of the law's testimony. The words were spoken and they were not pointed out in the court, the FIR did not give any of the suspects, nor did they mention any specific role. The identity test was not abandoned immediately after the arrest of the accused, which was necessary in the circumstances of the case. The testimony of eyewitnesses who had only a glimpse of the accused. It was not safe to base the sentence at the time of the incident. The appellants were acquitted against the fate of the accused.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Chacklala lawyer
