Find a Lawyer

SUHAIL ISHAQ versus SH. MAHMOOD AHMAD

The applicant has claimed to have disposed of the car in dispute because of the termination of the orders for application for interim delivery of sections 6 516A and 1 56 (A. Was a good buyer and that all the relevant documents in his car were disputed by the police in the custody of the defendant even though in one case, one of the accused was registered by the petitioner's father, But the defendant claimed ownership of the car, the car registration book in dispute was still in the name of the defendant, the applicant said The owner of the car claimed to have been shipwrecked on the basis of a letter of exchange, but it did not contain the name of anyone who had been disputed by car transfer. The letter contained not only the registration number, but also the alleged signature of a person was blank. The following courts were, in the circumstances, correct in relying on the above letter request for interim custody of the applicant filed by the applicant was unanimous. famous lower court advocate from Gaggo Mandi lawyer