MUHAMMAD NAEEM versus THE STATE
Section 497 (5) Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII VI of 1979), Section 10 (2) / 11 bail, dismissing the charges against the accused was that he was armed with a deadly weapon along with his accomplice. Was seized by force. The complainant's abducted mamas were presented with his alleged abductor along with the rape bill because an accused trial court agreed to extend the release on the accused's bail. In this case, the accused, who is a voluntary party, has yet to see if the story of his abduction in the FIR was true or he himself went to trial against the accused, according to the section PC. The trial came under further investigation under section (2) of section 497. The court, in the circumstances, did not make any mistake in extending relief to the accused's bail; the petition filed by the complainant to cancel the accused's bail was dismissed,
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Hayatabad lawyer
