MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus CIVIL JUDGE
Article 13 (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for execution of money order Judge's debtor objected to the auction of property and the issuance of a cell certificate; Auction / Sales Certificate Revoked The auction buyers claimed from the auction buyer the claimants who had applied for the order to cancel the auction / sale certificate, claiming that the buyers withdrew the amount, but it was removed. In response to the objection filed by the auctioneer of the Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, the auctioneer did not disclose that he had conducted the sale process in favor of the applicants because the auction buyer's title was defective and The applicants had stepped into his shoes, so he could not come. Go ahead and claim that they have been granted a right anyway The sale of the property by the sale deed and the change in favor of the applicants was not canceled, thus they will be auctioned for the refund. Can go to court and costs are not a necessary part of the case in resolving the grievance of the applicants order. Holder was satisfied against the person who was the object of the verdict, which was the object of execution, not challenged by the courts in any forum, he had finalized and he could not be punished at such a confusing stage. ?
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Nowshero Feroz lawyer