Find a Lawyer

RAMZAN ALI versus CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT USHR AND ZAKAT COMMITTEE, NAROWAL

5, 6, 7, 12 and 14 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition Zakat and the selection of the Chairman's Committee Zakat and adherence to the procedure prescribed under the provisions of the Rules 1993 Act. Failure to do. The applicant was that he was elected as the chairman of the committee but the notification was not issued by the authority stating that the selection of the chairman in this regard was made before the selection / selection of the members of the committee. Was caused by ignorance. The Conveyor of the Selection / Selection Team did not perform the prescribed procedure provided by the Law Election Team. The proposed proposal of the law was to follow the procedure prescribed in the law and the rules and in case of violation. I would also be convinced that it is not done in accordance with the law where the performance of a function under the law requires performance in a particular way so that it can take on the legal effects that affect the affected person. The most valuable rights of any person or group of people, it must be performed and by all other means its performance will either be prohibited or, if performed, it will be legally binding. Giving utilities will have no effect. The relevant Act / Local Zakat and Usher Committee was not selected according to the law, it was illegal, without any legal authority, and it was set aside. The High Court directed the authorities to keep the latest in accordance with the law. Elections were held, application was dealt with. divorce advocates from Kahuta lawyer