MST. ZUBEDA BEGUM versus MST. SAT BHARAI
O VI, R 17 Appeals for Justice Administration to leave property without owner disputes between the parties in connection with the ownership of the suit The trial court dismissed the case and a new appeal was raised as to the plaintiff on appeal. Which was excluded. The basis for which it was not mentioned in the plaintiff's case is that the lower courts had failed to decide the suit property property, the first appellate court of accuracy would have looked at this request more seriously because this petition Will not be considered. Leaving the property without the owner of the property, deciding the plea available to either party without properly resolving the dispute between the parties, although taking the interim step would be against the principles of justice management and against public judgment. However, the first order issued by the appellate court was set aside and the case was first referred to the appellate court so that the petition raised by it was decided by the plaintiff. Permission was granted and the first appellate court was remanded to decide the case.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from FR Peshawar / Kohat lawyer