Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YASIN versus THE STATE

Section 497 (2) Offense Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Bail of 14 days in filing Section 10/11 bail, FIR Defendant defends valid marriage between himself and the alleged abductor What was In his statement under Section 161, the alleged abductor, the CRPC, had confirmed the accused's claim regarding his marriage with her. In his statement under Section 164, the CCP took a different stand. And accused her of abduction and abuse by the accused party. The woman stated that she had taken different positions on different occasions, even according to the statement given by the woman under Section 164, that the role attributed to the accused was secondary in nature, because it I was presented with them as principal misconduct. No one was charged with adultery or fornication and charged by the police. Police declared the investigating accused to be innocent during the course of the investigation. Continuing, in these circumstances it was not possible to fulfill any beneficial purpose, further investigation against the accused was required, they were accepted on bail. top advocate from Mandi Faizabad lawyer