Find a Lawyer

FALIK SHER versus THE STATE

Appeal against Section 417 (2A) Contempt of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 302 Proof of Evidence. Both eyewitnesses were residents of the same area and explained their presence on the spot. Such eyewitnesses did not intend to make false allegations. The witnesses' relationship with the deceased was not very interesting. It was not enough to declare and reject their evidence because it was credible because they relied on material points because the blood-stained ground could not be collected by chance. In the case of litigation when the doctor clearly stated that 1 x 2 liters of deep blood came out of the abdominal cavity and about 1 liter was removed from the right chest cavity. The court did not evacuate on the spot but the trial court failed to consider that only one shot W as the firing and fire was not being repeated as the incident was not possible to recover from the FIR. A natural reason for the delay in filing was explained by the fact that the complainant had tried to save the life of his deceased son by going to the hospital and instead of reaching the police station directly, the verdict was adjudged to the extent of the main accused. Was placed and sentenced to life imprisonment and sentenced under section 230b (b), P.P. Or because the mystery was reduced and was not renewed bullets. The accused was directed to pay compensation to the deceased's legal heritage under section 444444, PC Appeal immigration advocates phone number from Dargai lawyer