FIDA HUSSAIN versus THE STATE
Section 497 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Section 392/411 bail, the defendant's grant was not named in the FIR and was not accepted by the complainant in the identification test, only the evidence against the accused is alleged. As the motorcycle was recovered, it is yet to be seen if the accused could be held liable for the offense under 5 2 392, PPC while the offense under section 411, PPC. 497 was not included in the prohibited clause, the CCPC case of the accused was similar to that of the co-accused who had already been tried by the court of Additional Sessions Judge in other matters of the same nature. Been granted bail in the case before the inclusion of mandatory, it was not enough to deprive the liberty of the accused, no possibility of early termination of the trial against the accused. The conditions were guaranteed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from FR Bannu lawyer
