INTIZAR AHMED versus THE STATE
Section 497 (2) Offense Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII VI of 1979), Section 10/11 Bail, Further Inquiries FIR Grant shows that the accused's name was included in the persons who allegedly The victim was abducted, but the statement made under Section 164, CRPC, did not make allegations of kidnapping or commission of adultery against the accused and merely stated that the accused was also a co-accused. Was present in K Dera, the statement of the alleged victim under Section 646464, contradicting the contents of the FIR to the extent of the CCP accused, the matter was clearly that further investigation on the accused's crime, the case was In the meantime, he was entitled to accept the bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Jhang lawyer
