Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

INTIZAR AHMED versus THE STATE


Section 497 (2) Offense Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII VI of 1979), Section 10/11 Bail, Further Inquiries FIR Grant shows that the accused's name was included in the persons who allegedly The victim was abducted, but the statement made under Section 164, CRPC, did not make allegations of kidnapping or commission of adultery against the accused and merely stated that the accused was also a co-accused. Was present in K Dera, the statement of the alleged victim under Section 646464, contradicting the contents of the FIR to the extent of the CCP accused, the matter was clearly that further investigation on the accused's crime, the case was In the meantime, he was entitled to accept the bail

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
solicitors from Washuk lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.