Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus THE STATE

Section 497 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 409 of the Prevention of Corruption (II of 1947) Section 5 bail, the accusation against the accused was that he and his accomplices were arrested while he was in the PR Center. So they misused 69 360m tonnes. The wheat related to the Food Department was filed after a one-year delay in the FIR. The accused applied for director anti-corruption, which he mentioned was neither involved in the investigation nor in his The trial was heard before the sanction of judicial proceedings, so the Director of Injustice Anti-Corruption, on this request, ordered the matter to be reopened despite the agreement approving the prosecution against the accused, in view of all the facts, Specifically to send wheat stock standing on the PR mentioned on the occasion of registration of two separate FI bucks. The co-accused center, which was formed in collaboration with the department to oversee the case, accused the Center of misappropriating the wheat reserves and reopening the case at the request of the accused through director anti-corruption. Granted, further investigation into his crime was sought in the trial against the accused. list of advocates from Jaffarabad lawyer