SABIRAN BIBI versus NAZIR
Section 171717 Appeal against the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302/148/149 bad prosecution had failed to prove that purpose, both witnesses who witnessed the opportunity, made unkind amendments to their statements. Customize None of the house where the medical evidence allegedly appeared was cited as a witness in this case, and no independent help was available from any source for the fraudulent testimony of interest, and F on the spot. The IR was not registered, but it was recorded that no one in the hospital tried to inform the police and the police reached the hospital on their own, no crime was recovered on the spot, the suspect identified the weapon. In these circumstances, the prosecution had no benefit. The spot was taken in front of the shop in front of the market, but the blood stained land was seized from inside the shop's courtyard. The appeal by which the accused was acquitted on the basis of proper appreciation of the evidence cannot be interfered with unless the appellate court interferes with the trial court's bad order. Simply because the appellate court's acquittal of the accused on the re-examination of the evidence will lead to a different conclusion of the court, provided both are able to draw conclusions.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Fateh Pur lawyer