Section 2 302 (b) Definition of Evidence The benefit of the doubt was the case against the unknown accused, although the details of the unknown attacker were found in the FIR, but the details disclosed and the statement of the unknown assailant made progress in this case. Will not forward request. The supply of light at the shop where the contents of the FIR were completely silent in this regard, and the site's plans were widespread, also did not identify any clause of the prosecution's witness, although no witnesses to the incident. What, but almost eliminated it. At the gate of his brother's shop, he saw the unknown suspects. It was not known how the witness could look at the suspect. And in the absence of light supply to the site, disclose the characteristic of the attacker, where he allegedly saw the unknown suspect, although the complainant identified him during the identification process, but said That will not move the litigation application to double the identity. For reasons, of course, in the absence of light supply, both witnesses were unable to know the characteristics of the assailants and the identity of the accused in the identification parade was meaningless; secondly, there was no dispute. The accused was another person. In the absence of clearing the guilt involved by the supplementary statement of both witnesses before the identity test, there will be no case before the E-Correctional Report for the forensic science laboratory, regarding the working condition of the pistol itself, Could not prove guilt of the accused in the commission of crime
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
