GULISTAN TEXTILE MILLS LTD. versus ASKARI BANK LTD.
O VII Rr 1 & 11 Plaland's general quality test was the basis of a lawsuit, the meaning of the process, the meaning and the basic elements of the cause of action was the basis of a case and it was the full state of the material facts that was necessary for the plaintiff to work. The reasons for doing this were and prove their success: First, the violation of duty by one individual to another. The second loss resulting from infringement has been incorporated from the very beginning with the fact that it is material that enables the plaintiff to succeed, and any fact in which the defendant has to pass the test Get the right The reason for the action was that if the defendant stated what he said was true, whether he gave him relief or not in law, the violation of his right to action meant that the opportunity for that action was offered. And it must be the vision of the institution. A suit must be filed under the suit and on the basis of which, if it does not show cause for action, the court will dismiss such a plaintiff, therefore, the proceeding of the case must be pregnant for legal reasons. And it would be meaningless and useless for a court to prove a result if the court was found to have been excused for any reason on proceeding, the purpose of granting powers under OVII, R 11, CPC Had to make sure that it was meaningless and was bound to prove abusive should not be allowed to take place at the time of court for judicial review, for example, initially, if the defendant took action. Please indicate a reason and if it does not, reject it. Without further ado
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
