MAKHDOOM AHMED ALIAS ZAMEER AHMAD versus NOOR AHMED
Section 561A and 249A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 419, 463, 465 and 468 of the National Database and Registration Authority Ordinance (VIII of 2000), Sections 18, 30 and 31 to remove complainant The petitioner, who was his brother, petitioner / accused filed a private complaint against the applicant alleging that another national identity card was obtained through various frauds and forgeries under different names of the applicant. A., escaped under the CRPC, causing him to be badly dismissed by the trial court and the appellate court. Reviewing, he dismissed the petitions under Section 616161A, CRPC, for termination of the concurrent orders of the courts below the trial court, petitioner filed a petition under 5 249A, CRPC. Just dropped it because it doesn't say anything. Earlier, the law argued that the reviewing court dismissed the trial case without reviewing the legal question about the revocation trial. Responding to the need for the recording of the evidence in this case, the respondents / complainants had already filed a case for cancellation of the second national ID card issued to the applicant / accused, which was filed against the applicant for fraud and national identity card. Claimed fraud in connection. The offense against the applicants / accused was covered by Section 30 (a) (c) (e) of the National Database Registration Authority Ordinance, 2000, the complainant was not able to complain against the applicant / accused. Because of the National Database Registration Authority Ordinance 2000
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
