MUHAMMAD IMRAN versus THE STATE
Section 13E Defines Code of Criminal Procedure (v. 1898), Articles 342 and 439 Evidence. The trial court, while recording the statement of the accused under Section 342, CRPC, did not contest the alleged pistols and ammunition and neither questioned the accused. Whether he has a recovered arm license, the trial will be presented to the accused during his statement under Section 342, CRPC, on charges that he had 30 bore pistols and 5 bullets and was questioned. Will do. Even if he did not have a license for such a pistol, the law's mandate was not complied with, which is a serious flaw in the prosecution's case and the defendant's conviction for such defective action. Can't be convicted. And the convicts recorded by the trial court and maintained by the appellate court were acquitted and the accused acquitted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Hassan Abdal lawyer