NAVEED AKHTAR ALIAS CHANDA versus THE STATE
Section 497 (2) Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 324/34 Bail, Further Investigator Complainant's Grant was not an eyewitness, but details of the incident were conveyed to him by another person and according to the police statement The other person was not seen on the charge of injuring the injured. The police statement revealed that the injured were stabbed to death by the other co-accused and the accused were caught and assisted by the devil. The complexity of the accused under Darius remains to be established when evidence will be found. The accused did not suffer any injuries and the statement of the injured did not show anywhere that the accused was armed with a knife. The accused was in custody since his arrest and nothing was recovered from his possession. The case of the accused was quite different from that of the accused. In case of further inquiry of the accused, he was admitted on bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Hariwala lawyer