Find a Lawyer

EJAZ HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Guarantee, FIR did not name the grant of further investigating accused and in the supplemental statements about two and half months after the complainant's incident The name was first revealed. And the question about the apparent value of such pending statements by the two alleged eye witnesses was to be dealt with in the case until it was said that no additional statement was taken against the accused. Was found innocent and named it in the column. No other accused of the challan was released at the mercy of the court. All such facts essentially made the accused's case because in further inquiry one of the accused was behind bars for eight months and his There was no ex-offender. Accepted bail in the circumstances online advocate from FR Peshawar / Kohat lawyer