Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

Section 2302 (b) Appreciating the evidence The complainant, who was the real brother of the deceased, was not a resident of the location of the incident, but was in fact a resident of the place 15 km away. The complainant and the prosecution's witness, who was the victim's husband, said the victim was fired with a double-barrel gun that fell to the left side of his abdomen, but according to the doctor who performed the autopsy, Only one injury was found near the abdomen's abdomen and there was no left side injury, and both exits were on the abdomen's back. If the eyewitnesses were present at the scene, they would have described the exact number of seats and casualties on the suspected complainant, who stated the distance between the victim and the assailant 3 feet, but according to the site plan, It was 10 feet; if the fire was shot from 3 feet away, it had to be black. There was a post-mortem delay. The period between the doctor's death and the post-mortem was 8 to 24 hours, which would mean that the incident could have happened at any time and not at the time the prosecution claimed that the names of the accused were not mentioned in the site plan. Was recovered and there was no effect of the recovery from the accused police officers who appeared as court witnesses that all the accused were found innocent as a result of their investigation, the defense witnesses, including the accused, presented before the court that They support the plea of innocence. About the accused, but the relevant magistrates did not agree with the opinion of the police, although the courts were not obliged, but sentenced or sentenced on a capital charge. immigration advocates email from Kahuta lawyer