MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 337A (ii) 34 bail, further investigation FIR's grant shows that the accused had put a blow to the complainant's head and thereafter The co-accused had beaten the complainant in two suits, which hit him in the head and a medical examination of the complainant showed that a person was found on the dispute in the condition of an injury, the statement in the FIR stated. And the complainant's Medico Legal Report did not report any other injuries. The accused presented all such facts as a further inquiry into the accused's case under section 497 (2), the accused was charged with the crime of PC under Section 497, CRP, C.C. The bail was not covered by the prohibited clause as in cases where bail is granted. There was a rule and exemption, while there was no unusual case for a bail in the refusal. The accused was behind bars for six months and no previous convict. The accused was admitted on bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Trinda Mohd Pannah lawyer
