Section 13 was filed before the performance of the students, the students and the accused plaintiffs, which was pronounced by the trial court, but the appellate court recorded the parties' justification statements on 19-8, 1998. Receipt sale price was accepted by the seller, the property was transferred and it was a formal condition to confirm the change, the sale was completed in 8 1998 for the purpose of pre-termination and to confirm the change and Prior to sending the notice, the copyright was announced. Al-Ishq Ashid was not defective; the notice of the abduction letter sent to the author did not prove that he was served or denied, as the postman as well as the postal clerk were required to testify in the same manner. Was not presented for because the real student notice of E-Assad in which it was reported that the addressee was unavailable and his "defendants" also refused to accept it, according to the same record. This advertisement is presented in the statement of the plaintiff applicant's lawyer. Failure to idol, which was mandated to file a pre-arrest case and both students were not requested and the law proved that no interference case was reviewed by the High Court. And was removed because it was removed from any substance. \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
