Find a Lawyer

MIRZA USMAN BAIG versus SULTAN MAHMOOD

Section 8 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 115 The suit for possession of the plaintiff was that the defendant denied the relationship of the landlord and the tenant, therefore, the case for retrieval / occupation by the plaintiff. Was filed which was right. Following the dismissal of evidence on record, the order was given by both the courts below and under section 115, the court was not liable to interfere with the conclusions of the facts of the courts below, within the jurisdiction of the CPC. The record proved, through documentary and oral production, that the plaintiff was the owner of the department property transferred to him by the Settlement Department, the plaintiff's dues were properly paid by the plaintiff, and the result was permanent. The transfer order was issued in favor of the defendant protesting against the property on the suit. The affidavit is up to the Supreme Court but the plaintiff's ownership was retained on the suit property The defendant, in the circumstances, failed to produce any evidence to prove that the suit property was allotted or transferred by the settlement. Was done or that he has obtained any right of ownership with respect to the suit property. top advocates from Jhudo lawyer