Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus THE STATE

The testimony of Sections 302 (c), 148 and 149 was not relied upon by the trial court on the account of the accused and found that the witnesses were not present on the occasion. The statements of the accused under Section 342, CCPC, which were the result of the fact that they had killed both the accused in view of the compromise condition, were granted by the trial court under section 2302 (c) to the accused under section 30302 (c). Is properly punished under , PPC, Watts maintained, but this was not a case of reduction in punishment as both the accused acted brutally and sustained multiple injuries to both victims, while in a state of intense and sudden provocation and surrounded quantum punishment. Was heard. The trial court upheld 25 years and a fine attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Deh Pathaan lawyer