GHULAM SHABIR QASIM versus SALAH-UD-DIN, ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, DERA GHAZI KHAN
Article 381, 382 and 9 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition of Black Warrant, Dear Aziz: The sentencing sentence was upheld by the Supreme Court and even without mercy. The petition was filed before the dismissal of the Additional Sessions Judge of Pakistan, when a black warrant was issued while acting as a Duty District and Sessions Judge, the brother of the convicted prisoner. Had filed a constitutional petition with the argument that the Additional Sessions Judge was not eligible for the issuance of a black warrant because only the Sessions Judge approved Section 381, Cr. The same can be done when the convicted prisoner was retained on all the forums provided under the law and failed to appear before the President of Pakistan. The mercy petition was a logical end to the execution of death sentence that could not be stopped, adjourned, nor revoked, under Section 381 of the CRPC Word Court of Session provided under section 381 or 382. Was used, CRPC was defined under Section 9, CRPC which included Sessions Judge and Additional Sessions Judge who were transferred, in the absence of a Sessions Judge. The Sessions Judge, who served as a Sessions Judge, dismissed situations that were incapable of misunderstanding the Constitution and were not fully capable of fully enabling the legal order / action. went.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Sarai Alamgir lawyer