SHER ALI versus THE STATE
Section 2302 / evidence 34 Definition of evidence The indication of guilt was provided by the evidence of three women who were close relatives of the accused, who had no background of hostility or background or misconduct from the parties. All said that three prosecution witnesses were permanently dismissed. As to how the crime transaction started before the commission of the actual crime of murder, it was said that witnesses were subjected to taxation and cross-examination, but nothing could be brought on record in favor of defense, There was no serious hostility, ill-will or malice against the accused, witnesses said, evidence of high credibility linked directly between the first case when the crime was initiated and the second where the victim was killed. The next item that was dropped was connected to the accused, the confessional statements of the accused were recorded by the magistrate who The same case was also supported by Syed Magistrate, who was subjunctive, but he did not bring any fatalities to the prosecution. As was agreed, there was no significant contradiction between the two, it was said that the shotgun and the hatchet were recovered. On the disclosure and identification and identification of the other accused, the victim's head, hidden by the accused, was released and taken into custody, and a site action and notification memo was also prepared in this connection. The evidence was given at the hearing. The incident also proved that the prosecution directly against the accused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Fizagat lawyer